Observing elections

In 2000, I traveled to Kosovo to observe that “country’s” first “independent” elections (Kosovo broke from Serbia).  In honor of America’s own election day, here’s an excerpt of my experience, adapted from my upcoming book:

“No Guns Allowed” should be enough to get me thinking about whether I should keep the polls open past the 8PM deadline, which is what the rowdy crowd outside wants.  Looking at the clock, I don’t have much time left to decide.  The minute hand on the clock inches over 7:58.  Angry shouts grow louder.  Hard soled boots on cracked pavement make their way inside, rhythmically, insistently.  I start to laugh.

The Kosovars working with me pause only for a moment and continue with their work.  They’ve been watching me come unraveled all day by the numerous complications that have arisen: missing names on voter registration lists; forgotten identification cards necessary to register; women who need help voting, like the one that’s just walked in with her grandson.  I stare at them.

“Miss Elmira, Miss Elmira,” one of the Kosovar election workers, all of whom are men, approaches me as I try to regain composure.  ”That woman—,” He points to the distinguished lady with grey hair tucked into a blue patterned kerchief that I’m mesmerized by.  ”She cannot vote by herself either.  They are asking if the grandson can help.  What shall we do?”

Among the things that have complicated this election are women who cannot vote by themselves because they’re illiterate.  Yup, women in the 20th century who can’t read or write, which is something no one seems to have alerted the OSCE about.  That’s the group that brought me over to be an election observer.  The OSCE is the international group that was tasked by that other famous international group, the UN, to organize and conduct elections in this former Serbian province that was until recently a war zone.

“Everyone votes alone – no exceptions,” is the OSCE rule.

Except, the OSCE also wants people to vote, which is what I decide is the more important rule to follow.  Therefore I’ve been allowing illiterate women to be assisted in casting their ballot all day long.  To do anything less would have felt like a betrayal of my own illiterate grandmother back in Turkey.  She grew up in a small village in central Anatolia where it was “not appropriate” for a girl to go to school, which is what I imagine many of the Kosovar women here are told as well.

“Miss Elmira?” my young Kosovar colleague repeats.  ”What shall we do?” I don’t answer him.  I stare intently at the elderly woman who hangs on her grandson’s arm.  The grandson is no more than thirteen or fourteen years old.  He is awkwardly tall in that way adolescent boys can be, with long lashes and wispy childlike bangs that are mismatched on his grown man frame.

He, however, is not awkward.  There is a reassuring confidence on this young man as he makes the case for why he needs to help his nana, as I hear him refer to her, fill out the ballot.  Clearly he has done this before.  And I recognize it because I too grew up helping my mother who was not illiterate, but who, when I was a child, struggled with English.

As early as I can remember, long before Kindergarten, my mother would have me talk to bank tellers, electricians and telephone repairmen because she couldn’t.  She would speak in her native Turkish and I in English.  They would speak to me in English, I to my mother in Turkish.  I never thought much about how or why we did this.  We just did.  And I didn’t like it all that much.  I especially didn’t like the bank tellers who preferred to talk to other customers and made us wait; tellers who when they did talk to us, were always in a hurry to get rid of us.

“Miss Elmira, Miss Elmira,” one of my election colleagues jolts me out of my trance.  ”It’s almost 8 o’clock.  What are we going to do about all the people outside? They are getting angrier.  Some said they will burn down the school if you didn’t let them vote.”  As I look around the damp, drafty, and dilapidated two-level school house, I realize I can’t stall any longer.  I have to decide whether to keep the polling station open.  I turn to one of my Kosovar colleagues.  ”Let me go outside to see how many people re standing in line.”  He tries to stop me, as does the security guard.  ”Why don’t you stay here and I’ll go?” he asks, the crease in his forehead deepening.

“It’s okay,” I say.  ”I’ll just take a quick peek.  It’ll only be a minute.”

It does take me a minute to walk outside to see there is a crowd of maybe 30, or is it 40, men who descend upon me like a swarm of bees on honey, overpowering my sight and hearing.  I run right back inside the school. This makes their voices grow louder.  I tell the security guard to keep them out.

“These men are not happy,” the security guard tells me, not so much because I need a translation but because it’s the nicest way of saying, “I told you so.”

“Okay,” I say before he or anyone can ask me “What are we gonna do?” again. “Okay,” I repeat waving my arms up and down as if that will calm the situation.  ”Okay,” a third time, “I need to radio into OSCE headquarters and ask for KFOR back up to help keep this situation under control.”  KFOR is NATO’s military presence tasked with keeping Kosovo peaceful.

All election observers were given a circa 1980-Jack Ryan-CIA-like walkie-talkie radio.  ”Keep this on at all times,” we were told, “in order to get the latest information… And use them if you have any questions or require any assistance.”

I had vowed that I wouldn’t call in for any assistance.  I had studied the entire manual thoroughly and taken a weeklong training to become an election observer seriously.  As if I were back in junior high school where we were rewarded for raising our hands first or volunteering to kick off a discussion, I would be the model election observer — held up as a shining example.

I walk back into the room where the elections are being held and grab the grey metal box and call in, “HQ, do you read me?  HQ, this is Ferizaj.”  Ferizaj is the name of the small town I am assigned.

“Go ahead Ferizaj.”

“HQ, I’m in need of back up here.  I’ve got several dozen Kosovars still lined up.  They’re starting to get rowdy.  Do you copy?”

“Copy that Ferizaj.  Does that mean that you’re not close to closing down?”

“Negative.  I need permission to keep the polls open past deadline.”

“Copy.  Let’s get you KFOR back up and we can talk about the poll closure in a few.”

“Copy that,” I say as if I know anything about this language that, as I far as I know, is spoken only on the big screen.

I walk back out to the front door of the school where I’m overwhelmed by the smell of cigarettes and shouts.

After five minutes I hear a large vehicle approaching the school.  I peer outside the window and see a large white light.  All the men gathered at the front door scatter. That’s when I catch a glimpse of the huge tank that’s just pulled up and parked itself in front of the school.  Several men in khaki helmets and khaki clothes get out. They’re all holding machine guns and wearing protective armor.  Now I really want to laugh.

I open the door to the school and walk out.  One of the soldiers approaches me and in a German accent asks, “Are you the OSCE person?”  Speechless, I nod.

“Okay then.  We’re here to keep the situation under control.  You can go about your business.”

Okay then.  I can go about my business – you see you angry, cigarette puffing Albanian bullies?  I’m in charge here.

I’m in charge.

Shit. I’m in charge.

I walk back into the classroom where the voting is going on and take a deep breath.  I rub my temples.  It’s 8:05PM.  There are at least 30 more people outside, some of whom won’t have the proper documentation or appear on this voter list.  If I agree to let them vote, we’ll be closing the polls at around 10 or 10:30.  A two-hour delay wouldn’t be so bad if I didn’t also have to count votes.  And if the count is anything like what’s going on in Florida, we’ll be here all night.

I’m tired.  I’ve fueled myself on nothing more than coffee.  My heart races at the thought of being here until the wee hours of the morning.  I pace.  It’s a regular sized classroom with high ceilings, a few worn wooden desks and broken chairs. There are a few alphabet posters on the wall.  Education in Kosovo seems no different than it is in Brooklyn.

As I walk up one side of the room, I catch a glimpse of the elderly woman with the blue kerchief.  She’s still got her arm tucked into her grandson’s.  They walk towards me.  My spine goes slack.  Shit. I can’t handle another person yelling at me.  I turn away and walk in the other direction toward the door and into the hallway.  They follow behind.

“Excuse me lady, excuse me,” the boy calls after me.  I stop and turn around.   I’m cornered in the hall.  There’s nowhere to go.  No bathroom to duck into.  No person to hide behind.

The old lady approaches me, opens her arms and puts her head against my chest.  I let out a gasp, unsure of what is going on.  My arms are paralyzed underneath this little woman, who won’t let go.  One of the Kosovar election workers joins us in the hall.  He starts talking to the grandson.

“The lady wants to thank you for giving her the chance to vote, – for giving Kosovo this chance for freedom.”  She lets me go without uttering a word and again clutches her grandson’s arm.  They walk away.

I walk back into the classroom and pick up the walkie-talkie.

“HQ this is Ferizaj do you copy?”

“Go ahead Ferizaj.”

“Thanks for the KFOR backup.  With your permission I’m going to keep the voting going.”

“Copy that Ferizaj.  You’re not the only one.  It’s going to be a late night.”

“Great. That’s why were here, right?”

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Pakistan postcard part two: Sound

Part two of my five-part postcard of impressions of my Pakistan visit is what I heard….

Sound

Pakistan cars & busesPakistan hums with machinery.  It is a powerful hum that, in certain instances, drowns out all other sounds.  One barely notices the cacophony of Pakistani families who travel in packs, or hears the ‘Allahu akabar’ of the azan, the Islamic call to prayer, or even the jingles of the brightly colored and elaborately adorned trucks and buses whose hoods are decorated with a belly dancer’s jangled hip scarf.

This potent hum, however, is no white noise.  It is the reverberation of back-up power generators that are found in most Pakistani businesses, hotels, offices and homes.  With persistent outages that can last up to 15 hours daily, self-powered generators are the only viable option, for those who can afford it.  I counted five outages sitting in my five-star hotel one night.  Yes, Pakistan has an energy crisis.

Pakistan’s government has not adequately responded to this crisis.  Rather than repairing outdated power plants that lack capacity production or resorting to alternative and less expensive sources than oil and gas, it has called for a reduction in supply, decreed that “marriage halls will no longer be able to host all-night wedding parties,” and has banned neon signs and brightly-lit billboards.  To be fair, Pakistan is afflicted with a host of other plagues including insurgent violence, unemployment, inflation, corruption, weak governance, and crumbling infrastructure, made worse by this past summer’s devastating floods.

AP photo

AP photo

Still, without solving the key matter of energy, the country has little prospect of economic progress or defeating the insurgency.  “The shortages have crippled industry and led to rioting across Pakistan,” a BBC report says. Energy: Pakistan’s Catch-22.

Pakistani officials blame tax evaders for the problem.  “Why should Pakistanis pay their taxes,” one citizen told me, “when they have to pay out of their own pocket for the basic services the government cannot deliver?”

While energy is ultimately a government’s responsibility to provide, it needn’t be government’s burden to produce.  There are entrepreneurs that have ideas for solving Pakistan’s energy crisis.  Wasae Shaikh, a scrappy and scrawny 25 year old I met at Karachi’s Institute for Business Administration, is one such person.  Shaikh, a second-year MBA candidate, wants to set up model villages that produce solar and wind energy.  National Geographic sparked his idea.

“I watched this episode about wind farms in Amsterdam,” the trim bearded Shaikh said to me as we stood underneath a large tree in the institute’s courtyard.  He thought, “We’ve got wind here in Pakistan.  The sun too.  We can launch an alternative energy business using solar panels and biomass fuels,” he said pausing to look at me.  “I want Pakistan to be self-reliant. We have to give it a try for our people.  I want to do it for my people.”

Wasae Shakikh's Talentrepreneur shirt caught our attention on IBA's campus

Wasae Shakikh's Talentrepreneur shirt caught our attention on IBA's campus

“For my people,” was a refrain I kept hearing from Pakistan’s youth and its entrepreneurs.  Their country may not have enough energy, but they do.  And they’re using theirs to pull Pakistan out of its political and economic abyss.  Young and bright Pakistani entrepreneurs, who have the option to leave, are staying behind to launch businesses, in such fields as textiles and technology, to help their country.  Wasae Shaikh is one example.  In the coming days and weeks I will give you others.  Through their efforts, Pakistan, I believe, will continue to hum, not to the machinery of generators, but the machinery of this generation.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Pakistan postcard part one: Sight

A week ago, I visited what is supposedly one of the most dangerous places in the world: Pakistan.  While I do believe the country has serious security concerns, the only threat I came up against was traffic.  And that, compared to New York or Istanbul, wasn’t all that bad.  Here is the first of my five-part postcard of impressions, through those things that allow us to have them, our senses:

Sight

“Welcome honored donors,” read the banner hanging over the passport control counter at Benazir Bhutto Airport in Islamabad.  That, along with hot, musty air, was my greeting to Pakistan, at 3AM two Sundays ago.  I had arrived, along with my colleagues Phil Auerswald and Sara Shroff to assess Pakistan’s entrepreneurial landscape.

Not far from the banner, there also hung a framed black and white photo of a gaunt man in a dark textured and triangular hat, similar to the one that Afghan President Hamid Karzai sports.  It was Muhammad Ali Jinnah, the revered founder of Pakistan – the land of the pure.  Jinnah established the republic in 1947, after gaining independence from the British and breaking from India.jinnah

Jinnah reappeared a half hour later when I entered the lobby of the infamous Marriott Islamabad.  He was there again the next day when we visited the Institute of Business Administration in Karachi.  Jinnah seemed to be everywhere.  The only other place I know of where that happens is… Turkey.  The image of Mustafa Kemal Ataturk, the blue-eyed founder of Turkey, is, like Jinnah’s, ubiquitous throughout Anatolia. Both dominate every government office, school entranceway and public space.

Pakistan and Turkey have a lot in common.  As predominately Muslim nations, both have struggled with secularism and Islam.  Both have had, as a result, numerous military interventions that have overthrown their respective country’s government.  As predominately agrarian societies, Pakistan and Turkey have wrestled with developing their respective economies in order to compete on the global marketplace.  For a long time, it was a tough fight.  Both countries choked under unemployment, debt, run away inflation and rent seekers.  Pakistan still does.  Turkey has broken from that cycle.

It broke as a result of the economic liberalization reforms enacted by late Prime Minister Turgut Ozal in the 1980s.  With less state-control and relaxed trade and banking laws, Turks embraced entrepreneurship.  Overnight, they turned Anatolian cities, more commonly known as “Anatolian tigers,” into textile and manufacturing centers and lifted Turkey’s poor into the middle and upper class.  Today, Turkey holds a seat at the G20 and the UN Security Council.  Despite being continually rejected by Brussels, it has, by the European Commission’s own account, the fastest (and perhaps only) growing economy.  It is an example that beleaguered Pakistan can and should replicate.  It should do so with Turkey’s guidance.

One of Islamabad's main roads

One of Islamabad's main roads

Turkey understands Pakistan’s economic struggles because Turkey once endured them as well. “We have common problems and common solutions,” said Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan while visiting Pakistan just last week.  Part of Turkey’s solution is taken directly from Washington in the form of aid.  *Sigh.*  Fortunately, the other part of Turkey’s solution is precisely what Pakistan will help Pakistan develop: investments.

Rather than a money problem, Pakistan suffers from an investment problem.  The money that Pakistanis possess is caged. It’s used to cover day-to-day expenses rather than being used as leverage to create new enterprises and, most importantly, jobs.  Turkey has discussed opening banks in Pakistan, increasing trade and encouraging its private sector to seek collaboration on construction, infrastructure, engineering, energy, agriculture, telecom and textile opportunities.  That is a good start.  But more can be done.  Here are two suggestions:

  • From a historical, religious and cultural perspective, Turkish entrepreneurs and investors are ideal role models and mentors for aspiring Pakistanis with start-up ideas.  They can help advise on operating in a Muslim society where entrepreneurship has not traditionally been encouraged or possible, where risk has largely been absent and where failure has always been the kiss of death.  Both countries could develop an entrepreneurship exchange and mentoring program where Pakistani entrepreneurs spend time working in Turkey and Turkish entrepreneurs in Pakistan.
  • Turkish investors could establish, along with their Pakistani counterparts, a fund, with manageable interest rates and transaction fees, for Pakistani entrepreneurs.  It is an idea that American venture capitalists would benefit joining as well.  This will help unshackle Pakistan’s paralyzed capital that can then provide the leverage to jumpstart enterprise development and job creation.

It is imperative that Pakistan climb out of its current crisis and into prosperity.  There are signs it is prepared to do so.  The absence of Jinnah’s photo in the sleek and modern offices of the several entrepreneurs Phil, Sara and I met with was the clearest.  Pakistan’s younger generation, while deeply patriotic, is not straightjacketed by the past.  They know that while Jinnah may have been their country’s founder, they are its keepers.  For now, they’re pushing their black and white past aside in order to keep their focus on what could be Pakistan’s abundantly colorful and high-definition future.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 6 Comments

Clinton Global Initiative 2010: Things that made me go “hmmm…”

imagesPoverty: A man or a woman?

This year’s CGI kicked-off with “girl power.”  Specifically, the need to educate them, protect them, respect them, prepare them and empower them.   Among the ideas tossed around at this week’s do-gooder conclave that made me go “hmmm”:

  • Technology: Cherie Blair who heads up her own foundation for women wants to, along with Google, Microsoft and Cisco (CGI’s big sponsors) increase women’s access to technology, i.e. mobile phones and computers, in order to increase their ability to communicate.  That’s not what grabbed me.  This was: “When we’re talking about the poor we are talking about women,” Blair said.

Are we?  Solutions that focus on educating and empowering women in the developing world are imperative.  It is equally as important to educate men in the developing world so they may understand why.  This is why I like this campaign:

  • Real Men Don’t Buy Girls: As mind-boggling as it is, people, (mainly men but some women too), buy and sell other people, (mainly women).  It’s beyond evil.  Ashton Kutcher and Demi Moore launched the “Real Men” campaign, “with a passion bordering on anger” intended to stop human trafficking.

Absolutely let’s support women.  Let’s make sure men are part of the conversation too.  And let’s not forget that empowering women also requires changing laws, particularly those on property (Women own less than 15 percent of land worldwide) and inheritance rights.  It also requires enforcing ones regarding violent crimes.  If honor killings and rape are an offense, then prosecute the offenders.

Mismatched.com

“CGI is about networking,” remarked Katie Couric, after Liberian President Ellen Johnson Sirleaf asked Coca-Cola CEO Muhtar Kent to ensure her that Liberia is included in Coca-Cola’s efforts to create jobs across eight African nations.  Hmmm… Networking, yes, but with whom and for what?

Not networking with the very poor.  CGI’s attendees were red carpet royalty or corporate titans, who made multi-million dollar pledges and paid $20,000 to attend. Yes government officials and non-profit leaders roamed the halls as well.  Yet, neither group experiences daily destitution.  Am I being too idealistic in believing that if we are going to help the poor, it would help if we talked to them?

Leila Janah, CEO of Samasource, didn’t think so:

“If you are ostensibly serving the poor how can you serve them if you’re not living among them and understanding what their challenges are?….The biggest mistake we make as a sector is that we think that we can sit in a big institution in D.C. and understand the problems of the poor by spending one week in a developing country and staying at a five-star hotel and driving around in a fancy car…That’s not the way we learn about our consumers.”

That speaks for itself.

Bill who?

Over CGI’s three days, Bill Clinton kept talking about how Bill Gates runs the biggest foundation in the world.  Turns out that foundation isn’t big enough for USAID.

“I was at the Gates Foundation for a long time,” USAID Administrator Rajiv Shah noted, “and often wondered how can I get USAID to partner with me.  It really wasn’t that easy.  And now that I’m on the other end I’m learning why it’s hard.”

Hmmm..He didn’t explain why it was hard.  As a former government official I suspect it has a lot to do with tremendous red tape.  Nothing gets done in Washington without filling out several dozens of forms, which have to be approved by several dozens of people.  Which is why I was surprised to hear him say that donors like USAID:

“(H)ave to ask hard questions about ‘Are we working with the types of partners that genuinely will build strong local institutions?’ Because at the end of the day the goal isn’t simply to solve these problems for others. The goal is to create the condition where our assistance is simply no longer needed.”

If Raj Shah can get the U.S. Congress to understand the importance of building strong local institutions in the developing world and stand down from its demand that USAID or any other U.S. government agency give procurement and outsourcing contracts to U.S.-based enterprises, he deserves the Nobel Prize….in Physics.

And speaking of Bill.. will the real one stand up?

The name behind the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation was the last headliner at the Clinton Global Initiative.  He wasted no time in responding to development skeptics: “It’s easy to focus on the things that aren’t going well and that are really a problem.  It’s important to maintain perspective.”  I couldn’t agree more.  It is, as Matthew Bishop noted, “so much easier to sneer than to report/analyze.”

So in analyzing Gates’s appearance, I was focused on this:

“If you look at its (MDGs) achievements they are pretty amazing,” Gates said.  “MDG One, poverty reduction, – we’re going to meet that.  The MDGs have served their purpose of getting people focused getting UN groups, rich governments and poor governments working together. ”

Hmmm.. I’m pretty sure that if poverty were Microsoft Bill Gates wouldn’t be so easy embrace the UN’s “progress” numbers.  He’d be a bad ass, demanding that more be done — because more needs to be done.  Poverty, as SKS Microfinance’s Vikram Akula pointed out, is growing at such a rapid rate that we need to counter it with equally swift, scalable and sustainable solutions.  The MDGs aren’t that solution.  Will the Bill Gates that knows that please stand up?

There were things at CGI that made me clap as well (it was a very musical week).  Here are a few of my favorite lines and moments.  Overall, CGI was, and is, a worthwhile event.  As I mentioned to Bonnie Koenig, “Talking about these issues, however imperfect the platform, is better than not talking about these issues.” And that these issues are being taken up by those that have the power and means to affect action is positive.  Positive is what I choose to hold onto in this field.

Favorite lines:

“Of course modern technology is very important for a good education.  But I would invest in the education of teachers because you can never under estimate human resources.”  — Finnish President Tarja Halonen.

“You know how many people (working in poverty alleviation) don’t know what they’re talking about?” Bill Clinton

“Democracy isn’t a spectator sport.” – Arianna Huffington

“Gender shouldn’t be a lottery: ‘who gets to blossom and who doesn’t.” – Queen Rania of Jordan

“Be suspicious when people say there’s no market (in the developing world).”  — Paul Farmer

“I’m grateful that Michelle isn’t running for any offices I am.”  Barack Obama

Favorite moments:

NPR Plant Money’s Adam Davidson noted that the “Profiting from the Poor?” panel with Grameen Founder Muhammad Yunus would… “…be a historic moment in the history of microfinance. When history books are written they are going to talk about this conversation right now.”  MUST WATCH.

Hanging out in the cavernous pressroom with @laurenist @sloane @texasinafrica @penelopeinparis @kenyanpundit @alanna_shaikh @ferenstein with occasional drop-bys from @auerswald.  Yes, we talked shop.  These are all smart and thoughtful folks who are serious about development and recognize that it’s not a “hobby.”

When Aid Watchers and White Man Burden author Bill Easterly started following me on Twitter.  That’s like getting asked out by Brad Pitt.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Alive and kicking: The web is not dead

The Web isn’t dead. That’s the verdict from day three at the Clinton Global Initiative, where the talk was focused on technology. Specifically, how technology enables: communication, innovation, and collaboration—not just for the poor, but with and by them.

Read more: http://www.portfolio.com/views/blogs/entrepreneurship/2010/09/24/alive-and-kicking#ixzz10diIJdHJ

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

It’s the markets, stupid

clinton-global-2010-strengthen-markets-largeThe take-away from day two of CGI is that development has moved on from the question of whether it’s okay to profit from the poor.  Today’s CGI nugget: embrace the market. That’s where the opportunity, as Bono has declared, to “Make Poverty History” lies. Or, to put it in Clintonian terms: It’s the markets, stupid.

Read more: http://www.portfolio.com/views/blogs/entrepreneurship/2010/09/23/clinton-global-initiative-discussion-focuses-on-poor-as-a-market

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Stop war or aid?

Linda Polman is a Dutch journalist who has just published The Crisis Caravan: What’s Wrong with Humanitarian Aid? I came across it through this Boston Globe piece that briefly summarizes its contents as well as an interview with Polman.  I have not read the book yet, but am eager to do so – with trepidation.  Based on the description in which Polman argues that aid workers “become the enablers of the very atrocities they seek to relieve,” Crisis Caravan strikes me as being to the right of Dambisa Moyo’s Dead Aid.  Stay tuned.

In the meantime, I wanted to share something in the interview that startled me:

Boston Globe: You talk in your book about how Florence Nightingale eventually developed a philosophy that we should just let wars be as terrible as possible, so that people would stop having them. Would there be less war without aid?

Polman: We don’t know, because we never tried to stop aid and then count the amount of wars, or count the amount of days that wars go on. But the thoughts of Florence Nightingale make sense to me. The cost…of the war should be left in the hands of the people who want the war. She thought that if you make it easier for warmongers to have their wars, then you prolong them and make them more severe.

I’ve never lived through war.  I have lived, however, through a post-war environment, in Bosnia-Herzegovina.  That’s when I realized there are two sides to a war: those in it and those outside of it.  Outside of it, we don’t have a clue what’s involved in war.  Does that mean we should ignore it?

When my friend Stephen Kinzer was writing A Thousand Hills, the story of Paul Kagame and Rwanda’s rebirth, and asked me what I, as a former international aid worker, thought about the international community’s failure to intervene in Rwanda’s genocide.  ”Hate to say it,” I told him, “But I think Rwanda is in a much better place than Bosnia precisely because the international community didn’t go in to f**k it up.”

The other day I read this interesting blog (I also watched this interesting debate with Tyler Cowen) looking at Peter Singer’s premise that if you see a child drowning you sacrifice your new shoes and turn up to work late.  You are, after all, saving a life.  The piece puts forth several thoughtful variables that questions whether saving that life is the best option.

Is it okay to sacrifice one life to save others?  By that same token, is okay, as Polman suggests, to withhold or stop aid during war in order to save future generations and prevent future wars?

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Capitalist Cuba?

CNN runs a story about the Castro government’s announcement to lay off 500,000 state workers over the next six months – and, interestingly to allow “private sector jobs.”  There are no details about how those private sector jobs will be created (I’ll get into CNN’s awful reporting another time).  CNN just says that:

“(a)lternative forms of employment to be allowed including renting or borrowing state-owned facilities, cooperatives and self employment and that ‘hundreds of thousands of workers’ would find jobs outside of the state sector over the next few years.”

How?  How do Cubans create their own jobs?  We in America love to encourage everyone in the developing world to become entrepreneurs.  But becoming an entrepreneur is far more complicated than just getting an independent taxi license, as CNN reports the Castro government has done.

Where is the financial system and capital market that supports private enterprise?  In China, where entrepreneurship is thriving, it is the state that is backing many of these ventures.  Castro’s government doesn’t seem to be in any position to do such thing.

Where are the supply and distribution chains?  With a tight grip on production, not to mention imports and exports, I’m curious where entrepreneurs will get supplies and to who they’ll distribute their products and/or services.

I’m a huge proponent of for-profit entrepreneurship.  But this piece got me thinking about how for-entrepreneurship’s success depends on government support – specifically through financing, the rule of law or laws that make it is easy to do business.


Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Can Turkey’s Prime Minister represent each and every citizen?

DownloadedFile“There are approximately 72 million people in this country,” AKP leader and Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan told me soon after he was elected in 2003, “and I represent each and every one.”

Given the vituperative and angered reaction from Turkey’s “secularists” following today’s “yes” vote to bring the country’s 1982 constitution further into line with EU standards, Mr. Erdogan would be wise to put those words into action.

Turkey’s “secularists” are the fierce defenders of Ataturk’s vision of a modern, Western-oriented Turkey, where religion and state are, rightfully, separate.  They are suspicious of the AKP, a party with a pious membership and a mosque-going leader.  Most are convinced that he is, as one woman described to me on a return flight from Istanbul a few months ago “turning Turkey into Iran.”  Today’s “yes” vote has put all of them on the defensive and, worse yet, offensive. Turkish tensions are running high.

You can read this or watch this for details about the constitution – why it needed to be changed, what was changed and what it means.  My point is this:

Mr. Erdogan now is the time to prove that you represent Turkey’s 72 million people and show your commitment to a modern, secular Turkey.

I am no fan of the Turkish Prime Minister. Still, I credit him with lifting so many Turks out of poverty into the middle class, increasing female education and representation in Turkey’s labor force and engaging so many citizens in the democratic process.  If Turkey is, as the European Commission acknowledged, Europe’s fastest (and perhaps only) growing economy, if it has a seat on the G-20 and the UN Security Council, it is because of Erdogan’s hard work.

Now Mr. Erdogan Turkey needs your leadership.

In the months leading up to the referendum, he did not display much of that.  Not only did Erdogan fail to reach out to “secular” Turks to convince them that the constitutional reform would be in Turkey’s collective interest, he has displayed a taste for authoritarianism.  As prime minister, Erdogan has censored select media that rails against him and arrested senior military officers on obtuse charges of plotting against the government.

Some would like to use this to paint Erdogan as some sort of Putin.  I do not agree.  I do believe, however, that Prime Minister Erdogan needs to lift his head up out of the deep political well he has dug himself into and rise up to be the leader that he himself knows Turkey desperate needs.

At the same time, as my friend and Turkey-expert Aengus Collins wisely pointed out, the secularists have a responsibility too.  In order for Erdogan to lead, the Turkish public must follow.  He is, like it or not, Turkey’s democratically elected leader – by a majority.  That doesn’t mean they blindly follow or do not challenge.  On the contrary, those who voted “no” should rigorously challenge Mr. Erdogan to work, as Aengus wrote me, “constructively with other leaders to craft a more comprehensive/democratic solution.”

Following this afternoon’s results, the Turkish Prime Minister reached out to the opposition with a conciliatory message, pledging to listen and work together – to “represent each and every” citizen in Turkey.  It is the opposition’s responsibility to engage him and challenge him to do it.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

What’s in a(n American) name?

sp_aaib058_16x20immigrant-family-on-ellis-island-posters11252674815Be afraid.  After reading today’s New York Times off-lead piece “Border Sweeps in North Reach Miles in U.S.” how can anyone not?

“The Lake Shore Limited runs between Chicago and New York City without crossing the Canadian border…armed Border Patrol agents routinely board the train, question passengers about their citizenship…’Are you a U.S. citizen?’ agents asked one recent morning, moving through a Rochester-bound train full of dozing passengers at a station outside Buffalo.  ’What country were you born in?’”

This comes just a few days after another NYT piece “New Life in U.S. No Longer Means New Name,” pointing out that immigrants to the United States are no longer “Americanizing” their names.  At glance these pieces are in contradiction, but upon closer observation they’re connected. Neither is good.

Unlike today’s article, “no new name” was meant to be a feel-good feature demonstrating America’s tolerance and diversity.

Here is why it wasn’t: There is no such thing as an “American” name.

That’s something I learned traveling from Sarajevo to the United States in 2004 when I was asked by a Dutch security official,  “Where are you from?”

“I’m American,” I replied.

The tall hazel-eyed Dutchman was not amused.  “No, you didn’t understand me, I want to know where you are from,” understanding all too well what he meant.

“Oh, I see, I’m from Brooklyn.” He clenched his jaw and continued to interrogate me about where my family was from, and finally where my name was from.  “Your name is not American.”  I told him that he was out of line.  He nearly hit me.  His colleagues restrained him.  I broke down in tears.

Letter after letter to Schiphol Airport and the Dutch Foreign Ministry, I demanded an apology – and explanation for such behavior.  “Never would I have expected,” I wrote,

“that in such an open and tolerant society (the Netherlands), which values self-determination, civil liberty and democracy, would I encounter such belligerent and horrendous behavior.  Questioning my identity as an American because of my name was inappropriate at best.  America’s wealth lies in the trove of its unique and diverse citizenship; there is no single definition or profile of an American.”

To which I received this reply:

“One of the signs our agents have been trained to scrutinize, (sic) is the surname of the passenger.  Your last name, although in your case belonging to a US citizen, probably has its origin somewhere in the Balkan region.”

Here’s why I wouldn’t accept that response:

“My name originates from Brooklyn, NY….  Bayrasli is every bit as American as Van Buren, Eisenhower, Powell, Chavez, Giuliani or Shinseki. We all carry the same passport, and allegiance to a government that is based on equal rights and equal protection, because our identities originate from a Constitution that knows only values, not ethnicity.”

Here’s why this is important:

We are currently living in a post 9/11, Glenn Beck-restore-honor-to-America-Sarah-“there will be no ground zero mosque” Palin-immigrants-are-not -welcome-in-Arizona world.  Anti-immigration and Islamophobia are escalating to the point where dark-skinned men are being violently attacked and  some believe that “it is impossible for a Muslim to be a good citizen in America.”

Declaring that people are no longer “Americanizing” their names leads one to believe that a single group defined the American identity – particularly those from that single group.  While it may be true that a single group first came to America, they built it so that no single group or single person could dominate it.  That, unfortunately, is at risk.  Just read the apology I eventually received from Schiphol Airport:

“One of the security measures, regarding U.S. flights, approved by the Dutch Government and the TSA is the procedure of pre-flight questioning, the so called profile check, in which numerous possible signs are listed. One of those signs approved in the procedure, is the surname of the passenger.”

When TSA approves racial profiling; when border patrol agents wake “foreign looking people” to question their citizenship, America’s own name is in jeopardy, not just those of its citizens – new or old.  And that’s certainly something to be afraid of.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments